Critiques

Thomas Messer, director of the

Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum

1983

Rosemarie Koczÿ, who first came to our attention as an imaginative

and skillful weaver of tapestries, has subsequently developed into a

painter of scope and authority. The phase of her exacting, deliberate,

slow-process craftsmanship seems to have prepared and eventually

released her for the practice of an uninhibited artistry. This began with

freely scribbled drawings that, while yielding to a new gestural

spontaneity, nevertheless remained carefully structured. Feeling her

way into the paper medium, Koczÿ then opens up with an India ink

barrage in which her painterly instincts are no longer restrained as

brush replaces pen and as a new felt kinetic sense determines both form

and subject matter of her production. Koczÿ’s work in black and white

thus carried the germs of color within itself and remained a safe guide

and reference as she moved on to acrylic and canvas.

Having worked assiduously and often in relative isolation, Koczÿ, like

others in similar position discovered, not without some astonishment,

that she was not alone and that the images, so private and personal to

her, nevertheless form part of an awareness that many artists of her

generation share.

Her subject matter, which places man, woman, child and beast in an

environment pared down to basics, cannot be viewed without

contradicting sentiments, for who could fail to find in such post-industrial

visions a menacing as well as an ultimately consoling content? As in all

authentic creative expressions, however, Koczÿ’s art, in the last analysis,

speaks to us through formal authority and through convincing resolution,

leaving us thereby in a state of catharsis, uplifted and hopeful.

Michel Thévoz, director of the

Collection de l’Art Brut, Lausanne

1988

(translated by Louis Pelosi)

To silhouette a figure, inscribe it on a surface: an elementary graphic

operation, resolved already three thousand years, and within the reach of

any three-year-old. Now from this evident fact, Rosemarie Koczÿ has made

a problem. For ten years she has worked relentlessly to install a figure in a

paper or canvas rectangle; and the stability of this figure has become

increasingly problematic. Why? Because Rosemarie Koczÿ associates this

difficulty with that of her own insertion into existence. Moreover, and as a

result of the resonance between her drawing and her subjectivity proper, the

existential problem expands into a universal drama.

“Far, far from you, unfolds the world history, the world-wide history of your

soul,” said Kafka. Such is the paradox of artistic creation: expression of the

spirit of the time occurs by virtue of the most intimate introspection. It is

through extreme singularity that an artist attains universality. One senses

intensely that within the lines of the drawings of Rosemarie Koczÿ passes a

supercharged current which connects her existential anguish to an

indefinitely expanding network in space and time …

The more she advances in her dramaturgy of existence, the more the space

of the sheet of paper is charged with an energy which threatens to overturn

the rapport between figure and ground and to annihilate even the idea of

identity. The central figure loses the ontological privilege it held throughout

a thousand-year humanistic tradition; it is but an absence, an abyss, a stitch

threading through the tissue of existence, a breach in the wall of appearances,

an auto-consumption of space, the black hole of the astrophysicists, the

fantastic implosion of matter that destroys itself because of the very excess of

its own mass — in short, the metaphors swallow themselves up in this

catastrophic void, quite incapable of doing justice to the subtle and infinite

variations which, from drawing to drawing, and without breaking the thread,

resume and develop a unique theme.

So long as we allow ourselves to be drawn along, we will sense that, beneath

this obsessive uniqueness, each drawing has its tessitura, tonality, modulation

and rhythm proper to itself — ultimately, it is the musical metaphor that

captures it. “It is not the gods who created music, it is music which created the

gods,” said André Malraux. What then stands out from the graphic symphonies

of Rosemarie Koczÿ is the empty place left by the gods, that is to say a

redoubtable sacredness, fundamentally and tragically god-bereft.

Fred Licht, curator of the

Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice

1988

Darkness is one of the great themes in art as in literature of our times. Our

darkness, unlike the darkness, say of Rembrandt’s paintings, is an absolute

darkness. A darkness that is autonomous. For millennia, darkness, when it has

been a theme in art, existed as a function of illumination. Darkness gave light

its ultimate sacred meaning. Darkness was only the starting point of the human

condition from which it is redeemed by light.

Rosemarie Koczÿ is one of the few artists who has experienced the demands of

the epoch’s darkness, and who responds to the demand by making manifest in a

great wealth of drawings, the power of darkness, its triumph over all those areas

which once were consoled by light. In that, as in so many other aspects of her

work, she is totally (one would say brutally if it were not for the anguish that

accompanies each one of her drawings) uncompromising. Like Mr. Kurtz of

Joseph Conrad’s epic tale of human perdition, she has seen “the horror of it”:

and she is impelled by every fiber of her existence to send us warning signals

of what she has experienced. She seems never to have asked herself whether

these signals will be received and understood or not. She has no choice in the

matter. The power which enables her to transmute her recognition of darkness

into drawings, compels her to do its bidding. One hesitates to speak of her

“talent.” Talent implies something that is nurtured by any number of faculties,

by practice, by style. Talent is a consolatory gift. Goethe’s Torquato Tasso

recognizes at the moment of his deepest pain and humiliation that he is saved

by his God-given talent to communicate to others all that he has suffered. One

does not sense this kind of an artist’s prideful confidence when looking at the

drawings by Rosemarie Koczÿ …

Koczÿ’s drawings have a moral aspect … Part of this ethical bias resides in the

sense one has of her executing these drawings, as I have mentioned earlier, as

a warning signal … In other words, one receives the impression that she feels it

her duty to execute her drawings and duty cannot exist without a sense of

moral responsibility.

There is another level of Koczÿ’s moral impulse. Her images of fear and anguish

hint at there being a source of darkness and of evil. The origins of this evil are

forever inscrutable but the incarnation of evil tends to be of human semblance.

The fearful pain that is so often Koczÿ’s subject is perceived by her to be

transmuted by human creatures. There is always a tremor of panic in her work,

a panic induced by the knowledge that under the impact of terror, we the victims

might in turn hit out and become blind tools of darkness. Even in darkness,

Koczÿ keeps her eyes wide open.

These impressions cannot be “proved” to be correct. Nor certainly can they be

adequately defined by the poor critical vocabulary that has been forged in our

century for the enigmatic quality of so much of our art. Perhaps my reaction to

her drawings as being impelled by a need to speak to others as well as to herself,

perhaps this reaction is false … Perhaps, also it doesn’t matter at all whether we

ever arrive at a point of being able to express the quintessential, unrepeatable

impact of her images. What does matter is to follow her call to contemplate the

darkness which she shares with us and which she, unlike us, neither tries to

evade or deny.

Hans-Jürgen Schwalm,

director of the Kunsthalle Recklinghausen

2017

Rosemarie Koczÿ’s paintings, drawings and reliefs are profoundly human,

compassionate … Her work is an artistically convincing statement on the

darkest chapters of recent human history and the great tragedies of the twentieth

century, among which the Holocaust is unprecedented …

She translated her knowledge of weaving technique and also the variety of her

textile art into the drawing. This is how the thread becomes line and dominates

the graphic expression of almost all her works on paper. Whether as a powerfully

concentrated turbulence or a nervous filigree stroke, whether as a light texture or

dense network of the image ground, just as the thread in the square of the loom

the movement of each drawing is always braced in the coordinates of the image

field and, thus rhythmically disciplined, expresses a precise pictorial consciousness.

Comparable to textile work — be it sewing, weaving or spinning — we may also

speak of the medium of drawing as something elementary, almost archaic, and see

in it a constituent of human existence from the beginning. Even today it is regarded

as the most immediate release of an idea, as the most spontaneous expression of

artistic subjectivity and imagination … Drawing is always a sign too, and Rosemarie

Koczÿ has taken up and symbolically compressed this very aspect of the medium

with unremitting consistency …

She works within a narrow figurative canon, but also with an inexhaustible

repertoire of graphic signs that never degenerate into sentimentality, but through

empathy and compassion merge the conscious and unconscious, the subjective

feeling and the collectively inherited history. In essence her drawings and

paintings refuse anecdotal interpretation and, if you will, transform into an

abstract narrative. The figure, hovering on the ground of the picture, creates a

kind of immaterial aura refusing any real location. The surface transcends and

reveals that something that Jean-Paul Sartre once called “world-transcendence.”

Just as the line in Koczÿ’s drawings marks the narrow ridge between form and

shape, the drawn figures move … on the border between being and nonbeing,

life and death. The closeness of death is tangible in every drawing, even if it is

not portrayed and nobody dies … When the line almost disappears … it is no

longer an enclosing limiting contour, but vacillates between designation and

deletion, being and decay, so — to put it again — between life and death. In the

transparency and immaterial volatility of the lineament, which seems to be

absorbed again and again by the soft ground of the drawing paper, the slow

extinction of the depicted figures is reflected, a visualization as a mere

phenomenon and only a shadow of itself.

Death gets a face with every drawn figure — usually one or two and rarely a

group — and suddenly seems familiar. Death in the drawings of Rosemarie

Koczÿ is silent; in its silence the figures appear as if they were transfixed … The

bodies, sometimes huddled or spindly stretched, then twisted around themselves

and wildly dislocated, are transformed into pictorial signs, which with eloquent

expression and great formal precision stand against the anonymous, nameless

dying in the Shoah. Between black and white, polar opposites … and yet related

to each other, life oscillates back and forth in an eternal cycle. The worldviews

of human thought have always been inscribed in black and white, the notions of

good and evil, heaven and hell, death and dying. Rosemarie Koczÿ uses a lot of

black and only a little white to take an artistic stand and to color her view of the

world.